Rand Paul 'gets it'. No surprise there.
Tuesday, 17 July:
Monday's summit in Helsinki, Finland was yet another stunning moment in this most amazing of presidencies. Against a backdrop of literal seething rage and fury from those who opposed the meeting, the
two leaders spent four hours alone discussing events and issues of great import.
It shouldn't have been this controversial.
Not with President Donald J Trump invoved. The forces that have been arrayed against him since he won the election were
in complete unison. This meeting should not happen, it should be cancelled or at least postponed.
But why? Every president since Eisenhower has met with the head of Russia, then the Soviet Union. The prime reason?
To avoid a catastrophic war.
The two countries control 90% of the nuclear weapons on this planet. The media, fully invested in the Narrative that Russia aided the Trump campaign to cheat The Smartest Woman in the World of her birthright, has flogged this theme endlessly.
whole story is so full of holes that if it were seaborne it would sink in minutes has never really bothered them. They simply take whatever facts fit the Narrative, and twist the others to fit as well.
Those that don't are ignored and buried.
want to go full chapter and verse on all this; most of you already know that after Trump won, skullduggery in the previous administration started immediately. The dissemination of classified intelligence went to every agency in the government.
Thousands of bureaucrats, installed by the last lot, had their hands on TS/SCI intelligence that was gleaned by 'unmasking' American citizens who had peripheral contact with Russian nationals.
It was, and is, illegal. Most of it done by either Susan
Rice or Samantha Powers. To this date none of these people have been called to account for their actions, and when they are brought up they are universally defended.
This was just the tip of the iceberg; we all have been treated to
the circus at the FBI,with the very heads of the agency seemingly locked in an effort to depose a lawfully elected president.
It is against this backdrop that the president went to Europe.
His first stop was NATO. He immediately called them out
for the frauds that they are. The media here shrieks that 'he went after our friends and allies'. These 'friends' have lived high on the hog since the 1950's since SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe) morphed into NATO.
To prevent the USSR
from charging down the Fulda Gap with their 500 Divisions, the US stationed troops in Europe, mostly in Germany. It was a necessary element of the Cold War.
That was then. In 1989, the Soviet Union dissolved. That's THIRTY YEARS AGO. Cut to now.
Russia is a decaying, sad sack of it's former Soviet self. With an economy half that of California, and a declining population, they do have one thing: 4,000 nuclear weapons. They also have some very modern delivery systems.
There are some who want
to bankrupt the Russian Federation so they can seize the vast resources. Those would be world banking interests.
Others are itching for a shooting war. John McCain famously called Putin a 'punk', and that they could be defeated militarily 'with little
Folks, that's not just nuts. That's sheer insanity.
The US backed a coup against Putin's stooge in the Ukraine. Neo fascists were installed. Their goal was to corner Russian assets in eastern Ukraine, namely Sevastapol. Now,
western forces have been trying to deny the Russians this region since the Crimean War in 1853.
Which was, coincidentally, the first war financed by international banking interests; Junius Morgan, father of J.P. underwrote the British effort. It was,
as is the current effort, an attempt to deny Russia it's only real warm water port.
In essence, Russia cannot feed its country without it.
The other deeply contested region is Syria, driving Assad out of power and making Russia retreat. Why?
There is a Russian naval port at Tartus. The only other deep sea warm water port. See a connection?
Russia has said any attempt to drive it out of the Ukraine, where the natives all speak Russian, will be seen as an 'act of war'.
Yet the political left, it's water carriers in the media, and the neocon movement seems intent on pushing them into a corner.
Once again, this isn't just stupid, it's criminally insane.
So, what are you seeing? The president of
the United States, trying to avoid a shooting war with a wounded, but very dangerous adversary, which is HIS RESPONSIBILITY.
How is he being received? With open hostility, lies, hatred and threats of impeachment, even treason.
His own party isn't
much help; two years ago when this site was first launched the assertion that President Trump's biggest problem would be the GOP, not the Democrats. They predictably fell into the neocon party line; how dare Trump side with Putin against the 'intelligence
The day of rage took it's toll.
The president had to 'clarify' his comments on Tuesday. He meant to say 'would' instead of 'would not' when saying Russia hadn't 'hacked' our election. It was an obvious walkback. But he still slipped
in his little barb.
He said he had 'complete faith' in HIS PEOPLE in the intelligence community.
The 'other people'?
That's John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey. Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok. Just what about them should he have
a positive feeling about?
The facts are simply this:
The president met with a cornered,, and dangerous adversary who is looking for a way out. They spent four hours together, alone. Between these two men they know everything. There
is no secret that Bob Mueller or any other investigative agency has that these two didn't know.
The deep state toadies spent all day Tuesday demanding transcripts of the meeting. They want to know what they need to spin. But there were no leaks.
Drat. This made them very unhappy, and there's even talk of issuing a subpoena for the translator. Good luck with that.
President Trump took a big risk with this summit. There are powerful interests heavily invested in Russia as
an enemy; not just the banks who want war, but the defense industry and their black projects where warfighting money can be secretly siphoned off to.
His 'trump' card, if you'll forgive the pun, is that the supposed 'enemy' wants the same thing we all
do- peace and prosperity for his nation. Nobody is excusing the former KGB colonel as a patron saint of democracy.
Neither was Kim Jong Un, nor Premier Xi. Go all the way back. Breaking bread with dictators is distasteful, but necessary.
and Putin announced the end of the Cold War. Just two months ago Trump and the North Korean leader announced the end of the Korean War.
This really seems to hack some people off. The reasons have just been pointed out here; there are those invested
in war as a business model, and there are those who are so bereft of having lost power that they will back an economic collapse (Bill Maher) or even a nuclear war (various CNN and MSNBC 'experts').
To this author, these seem just inane, idiocy gone
Will the American people make the right call? Never have the stakes been so high...
Follow us on Twitter
This site would love to bring a better product to our readers; an improved platform that is more interactive is in the works.
It is more expensive, and since the site is self funded any and all aid would be appreciated. Every penny will go towards this goal.
Thanks for the consideration. gofundme.com/5jd7t8-fund-the-truth